I was not involved in the 2004 field experiment, so it is NOT the NASA JPL who failed to predict the cyclonic circulation in the Sound. Hopefully we will do better this time around. Let's find out early next week.
I heard that error, as well, Yi! For those who haven't had a chance to hear the piece, it was in the opening summary made by Steve Heimel, the reporter and not in Scott's comments. I think Steve mistakenly assumed that we're running the same models in 2009 as 2004... a good point to clarify/emphasize. I'm betting we'll do better this time around!
I heard that error, as well, Yi! For those who haven't had a chance to hear the piece, it was in the opening summary made by Steve Heimel, the reporter and not in Scott's comments. I think Steve mistakenly assumed that we're running the same models in 2009 as 2004... a good point to clarify/emphasize. I'm betting we'll do better this time around!
ReplyDelete